Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtern

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Laminar and turbulent flow in pipes

Posted 07.11.2012, 16:46 GMT-5 Version 4.2a 4 Replies

Asal Bidarmaghz
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi All,
I am trying to model fluid flow and heat transfer in a pipe for different fluid velocities. for Reynolds numbers < 2300 I use navier-stokes equations for laminar flow and for Re>2300 I use RANS (Reynolds average NS) for turbulent model.
the problem is that for 2000<Re<2500 if I run the model both in laminar and turbulent to have some overlaps to chekc the model and I get to very different outcomes and the laminar one in significantly higher that thew turbulent.
i would appreciate if you please help me with this.
4 Replies Last Post 09.11.2012, 01:46 GMT-5
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 08.11.2012, 02:07 GMT-5
Hi

have you checked that your results are mesh independent ?
particularly in this intermediate regime

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi have you checked that your results are mesh independent ? particularly in this intermediate regime -- Good luck Ivar
Asal Bidarmaghz
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 08.11.2012, 16:38 GMT-5
Hi Ivar,
yes I have done mesh analysis on that and meshing looks fine.
the model is mesh dependent but based on the mesh analysis results apparently I am using enough elements.

thanks
ASAL
Hi Ivar, yes I have done mesh analysis on that and meshing looks fine. the model is mesh dependent but based on the mesh analysis results apparently I am using enough elements. thanks ASAL
Asal Bidarmaghz
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 08.11.2012, 19:24 GMT-5
Hi Ivar,
now I am trying to use the new feature low reynolds number solver but even for a small model it takes ages and finally an error occurs. it is said in manual that in a pipe flow if you check the delta W+ and it still equal to 11.06 then the model should be fine. I get 11.06 but results are very strange to me.

thanks
ASAL
Hi Ivar, now I am trying to use the new feature low reynolds number solver but even for a small model it takes ages and finally an error occurs. it is said in manual that in a pipe flow if you check the delta W+ and it still equal to 11.06 then the model should be fine. I get 11.06 but results are very strange to me. thanks ASAL
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 09.11.2012, 01:46 GMT-5
Hi

I agre CFD is a world of itself I'm not an expert here, but there are others out there who are, maybe they could help too ;)

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi I agre CFD is a world of itself I'm not an expert here, but there are others out there who are, maybe they could help too ;) -- Good luck Ivar

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content