Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) generation from single slit perforated in metal film
Posted 19.08.2010, 05:06 GMT-4 Version 4.3b, Version 4.4 2 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Dear all,
Recently, I have been trying to simulate the SPP generation from single slit under the normal incidence of TM plane wave, a very basic simulation in Plasmoncis, using RF\In-Plane waves\TM waves\Harmonic propagation model. So the calculation area was air in which there was a freestanding metal (gold) film perforated with a single slit, and I set the bottom side as 'scaterring boundary condition', 'magnetic feild' =1A/m to excite the TM plane wave for illumination. The other three sides was surrounded by PML. Of the calculation results, the magnetic field distribution along the upper gold-air interface indicates that the PMLs absorb the propagating SPPs and the diffracted wave by slit well in the upper half space. However, there are some disturb for the field distribution at lower gold-air interface. Maybe, the 'scattering boundary condition' of the bottom side can not absorb the reflected wave by gold film and back-scattering wave by slit very effectively, compared to the upper half space enclosed by PML. Another question: how to excite the perfect plane wave without using the 'periodic condition', since it is the single slit rather than slit array in this model. Could someone give me some suggestions to ameliorate this model or some similar examples? Any help would be very appreciated!
He Kaiting
Recently, I have been trying to simulate the SPP generation from single slit under the normal incidence of TM plane wave, a very basic simulation in Plasmoncis, using RF\In-Plane waves\TM waves\Harmonic propagation model. So the calculation area was air in which there was a freestanding metal (gold) film perforated with a single slit, and I set the bottom side as 'scaterring boundary condition', 'magnetic feild' =1A/m to excite the TM plane wave for illumination. The other three sides was surrounded by PML. Of the calculation results, the magnetic field distribution along the upper gold-air interface indicates that the PMLs absorb the propagating SPPs and the diffracted wave by slit well in the upper half space. However, there are some disturb for the field distribution at lower gold-air interface. Maybe, the 'scattering boundary condition' of the bottom side can not absorb the reflected wave by gold film and back-scattering wave by slit very effectively, compared to the upper half space enclosed by PML. Another question: how to excite the perfect plane wave without using the 'periodic condition', since it is the single slit rather than slit array in this model. Could someone give me some suggestions to ameliorate this model or some similar examples? Any help would be very appreciated!
He Kaiting
2 Replies Last Post 09.10.2014, 15:04 GMT-4