Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
6 months ago
16.10.2024, 09:53 GMT-4
Updated:
6 months ago
16.10.2024, 09:59 GMT-4
In the physics formulations familiar to me, the high conductivity (rather than relative permittivity) is the essential EM constitutive property for your liquid metal, for MHD. And if you want your MHD model to work correctly, don't set that conductivity to be infinite. Use a physically-correct value.
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
In the physics formulations familiar to me, the high *conductivity* (rather than relative permittivity) is the essential EM constitutive property for your liquid metal, for MHD. And if you want your MHD model to work correctly, don't set that conductivity to be infinite. Use a physically-correct value.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
6 months ago
16.10.2024, 13:18 GMT-4
At RF the model for the usual metals (aluminum, copper, silver, etc. etc.) has relative permittivity 1, relative permeability 1, and conductivity large but finite. This leads to the usual values for skin depth- that is, field penetration that is small and decreases with frequency.
Some ferromagnetic metals may warrant a non-unity value for the permeability. I do not know of any circumstance where a large permittivity makes sense.
At RF the model for the usual metals (aluminum, copper, silver, etc. etc.) has relative permittivity 1, relative permeability 1, and conductivity large but finite. This leads to the usual values for skin depth- that is, field penetration that is small and decreases with frequency.
Some ferromagnetic metals may warrant a non-unity value for the permeability. I do not know of any circumstance where a large permittivity makes sense.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
6 months ago
22.10.2024, 00:47 GMT-4
In the physics formulations familiar to me, the high conductivity (rather than relative permittivity) is the essential EM constitutive property for your liquid metal, for MHD. And if you want your MHD model to work correctly, don't set that conductivity to be infinite. Use a physically-correct value.
Ok Thank you
>In the physics formulations familiar to me, the high *conductivity* (rather than relative permittivity) is the essential EM constitutive property for your liquid metal, for MHD. And if you want your MHD model to work correctly, don't set that conductivity to be infinite. Use a physically-correct value.
Ok Thank you