Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
05.01.2013, 05:21 GMT-5
Hi
If you have a tube, it's not only the diameter but also wall thicknes that should be considered, in addition to the length and the aterial parameters.
If you apply a "point" load you will get singularties, apply rather a Boundry load (surface for 3D, line for 2D but a tube is difficult to represent in 2D ;) or a Point in 1D.
Then if you want a radius of curvature you should rather apply a moment at the end and not a force, a force does not really give a regular radius of curvature.
Finally you need to define the "radius of curvature" there are some interesting threads on the FOURM try a search, somewhere one of the COMSOL employees have give a model to extract the radius of curvature for small and (?) lage deformations.
Once yo have the Radius you can define the moment (or force) as a global variable driven by the expression
(Calculated_Radius - Desire_Rradius)^2
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
If you have a tube, it's not only the diameter but also wall thicknes that should be considered, in addition to the length and the aterial parameters.
If you apply a "point" load you will get singularties, apply rather a Boundry load (surface for 3D, line for 2D but a tube is difficult to represent in 2D ;) or a Point in 1D.
Then if you want a radius of curvature you should rather apply a moment at the end and not a force, a force does not really give a regular radius of curvature.
Finally you need to define the "radius of curvature" there are some interesting threads on the FOURM try a search, somewhere one of the COMSOL employees have give a model to extract the radius of curvature for small and (?) lage deformations.
Once yo have the Radius you can define the moment (or force) as a global variable driven by the expression
(Calculated_Radius - Desire_Rradius)^2
--
Good luck
Ivar
Nagi Elabbasi
Facebook Reality Labs
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
07.01.2013, 09:08 GMT-5
Hi David,
I suggest you apply a moment not a point force as Ivar suggested. As an initial estimate based on beam theory the radius of curvature due to an applied moment = E*I/M.
Nagi Elabbasi
Veryst Engineering
Hi David,
I suggest you apply a moment not a point force as Ivar suggested. As an initial estimate based on beam theory the radius of curvature due to an applied moment = E*I/M.
Nagi Elabbasi
Veryst Engineering
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
07.01.2013, 15:34 GMT-5
I think I managed it, but I do have a question.
In my pipe, after running the analysis, and graphing the Von Mises stresses on the entire pipe, is there anyway to cut half the pipe off so I can see the stresses on the inside of the pipe?
Thanks.
I think I managed it, but I do have a question.
In my pipe, after running the analysis, and graphing the Von Mises stresses on the entire pipe, is there anyway to cut half the pipe off so I can see the stresses on the inside of the pipe?
Thanks.
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
08.01.2013, 00:59 GMT-5
Hi
Check the Results - Data set - Right-click - cut plane nodes and related help/doc
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
Check the Results - Data set - Right-click - cut plane nodes and related help/doc
--
Good luck
Ivar