Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtern

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Solid Mechanics: Estimating change in out-of-plane thickness in 2D model

Posted 08.12.2011, 15:08 GMT-5 Geometry, Materials, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions, Studies & Solvers, Structural Mechanics Version 4.2 4 Replies

Clinton Canaday
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello. I am trying to approximate an abrupt change in thickness in an otherwise planar part. The local increase in thickness is due to a reinforcement. I have really only found one approach, which involves modifying the modulus proportionally to the thickness, such that a region with twice the thickness would have a doubled modulus. Unfortunately, this does not work on a few initial trials, whether applied as a discontinuous change, i.e. two domains with different modulus but otherwise identical properties, or as a varying smooth transition.

I understand that a discontinuous modulus results in discontinuous displacement, etc. which is why it wouldn't solve, but are there other ways to do this since, in reality, the displacement is obviously not discontinuous, albeit gradients may be rather sharp.

I would like to avoid 3D modeling for a number of reasons, so please keep suggestions to the 2D domain.
4 Replies Last Post 10.12.2011, 03:53 GMT-5
Nagi Elabbasi Facebook Reality Labs
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 08.12.2011, 22:02 GMT-5
The approach you suggested should work. When the Young’s Modulus changes even abruptly the displacements should still be continuous.

Nagi Elabbasi
Veryst Engineering
The approach you suggested should work. When the Young’s Modulus changes even abruptly the displacements should still be continuous. Nagi Elabbasi Veryst Engineering
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 09.12.2011, 00:48 GMT-5
Hi

normally you have a sub node "Domain Change thickness". If you are in HT you must turn on "out of plane heat transfer" to activate thickness changes (this is also valid for 1D HT) and if you do not define any "out of plane heat flux it remains isolated.

In this way there is no reason to adapt the physical parameters, its cleaner and less error prone, but basically should give the same results

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi normally you have a sub node "Domain Change thickness". If you are in HT you must turn on "out of plane heat transfer" to activate thickness changes (this is also valid for 1D HT) and if you do not define any "out of plane heat flux it remains isolated. In this way there is no reason to adapt the physical parameters, its cleaner and less error prone, but basically should give the same results -- Good luck Ivar
Clinton Canaday
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 09.12.2011, 15:34 GMT-5
Thanks for the help. I meant to say discontinuous derivative, but now I'm insecure and have been reviewing FEM theory. That tends to get lost in "modelling".
Thanks for the help. I meant to say discontinuous derivative, but now I'm insecure and have been reviewing FEM theory. That tends to get lost in "modelling".
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 10.12.2011, 03:53 GMT-5
Hi

in gneral discontinous derivatives should be avoided, either by using "smoothing transitional function (step, pulse etc in v4 whixh include already the discreate Heaviside from v3. Or y sometimes using math with the weak form

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi in gneral discontinous derivatives should be avoided, either by using "smoothing transitional function (step, pulse etc in v4 whixh include already the discreate Heaviside from v3. Or y sometimes using math with the weak form -- Good luck Ivar

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content