Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
11.10.2019, 07:01 GMT-4
I didn't find a way to improve the resolution of the graphical interface, but I found out some things. I'll leave them here in case someone stumbles upon this post when working with georeferenced data in COMSOL.
- The artifcacts are only a visualization problem. Your problem will yield the same results as if the visualization was working fine.
- Try working in local coordinates. Take your minimum x and y coordinates. Use the 'move' operation to displace you whole geometry to local coordinates, by substracting your x and y on that move operation (z too if applicable). Your geometry will have the correct appearance now.
- If you later want to georeference your results, you just need to add the x and y you previously substracted, and there you go, you can get both COMSOL's visualizations working right and your geolocated data.
I didn't find a way to improve the resolution of the graphical interface, but I found out some things. I'll leave them here in case someone stumbles upon this post when working with georeferenced data in COMSOL.
1. The artifcacts are only a visualization problem. Your problem will yield the same results as if the visualization was working fine.
2. Try working in local coordinates. Take your minimum x and y coordinates. Use the 'move' operation to displace you whole geometry to local coordinates, by substracting your x and y on that move operation (z too if applicable). Your geometry will have the correct appearance now.
3. If you later want to georeference your results, you just need to add the x and y you previously substracted, and there you go, you can get both COMSOL's visualizations working right and your geolocated data.