Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

S11 and Gain Relation

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi everyone,

I have designed a compact dual-band monopole antenna. I considered the S11 and directivity as well as the shape of the pattern during the design process. I achieved two proper resonances at about 915 MHz and 2450 MHz. But now, I encountered a series of very low maximum gain values. I thought that if my S11 values are good (under -10 dB), then my maximum gain values will be good. But it seems that I was wrong. What may cause this very low gain values while my S11 values under -10 dB for both 915 MHz and 2450 MHz frequencies? I have attached the S11 and maximum gain values per frequency.

Thanks



6 Replies Last Post 15.09.2020, 05:11 GMT-4
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 13.09.2020, 06:50 GMT-4

I wouldn't expect anything better for a monopole.

-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
I wouldn't expect anything better for a monopole.

Robert Koslover Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 13.09.2020, 12:42 GMT-4

The gain could depend on the rest of your geometry. Is this a monopole over a large (or perhaps even infinite) ground plane, or something else? If you post your model file, then others here can take a look at it and may be able to offer suggestions, explanations, etc.

-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
The gain could depend on the rest of your geometry. Is this a monopole over a large (or perhaps even infinite) ground plane, or something else? If you post your model file, then others here can take a look at it and may be able to offer suggestions, explanations, etc.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 13.09.2020, 16:34 GMT-4

I wouldn't expect anything better for a monopole.

Thank you for your answer Edgar,

IEEE Standard for Definitions of Terms for Antennas says: "If an antenna is without dissipative loss, then in any given direction its gain is equal to its directivity."

The maximum directivity values of my monopole antenna are 1.82 dB at 915 MHz and 2.44 dB at 2450 MHz. Considiring the definition above, I think that the dielectric and conduction losses of my antenna are too much. But I couldn't find what I miss.

>I wouldn't expect anything better for a monopole. Thank you for your answer Edgar, IEEE Standard for Definitions of Terms for Antennas says: "If an antenna is without dissipative loss, then in any given direction its gain is equal to its directivity." The maximum directivity values of my monopole antenna are 1.82 dB at 915 MHz and 2.44 dB at 2450 MHz. Considiring the definition above, I think that the dielectric and conduction losses of my antenna are too much. But I couldn't find what I miss.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 13.09.2020, 16:47 GMT-4

The gain could depend on the rest of your geometry. Is this a monopole over a large (or perhaps even infinite) ground plane, or something else? If you post your model file, then others here can take a look at it and may be able to offer suggestions, explanations, etc.

Thank you for your answer Robert,

I couldn't post my whole model for now but I have attached the images of the general geometry and the electric field distributions on the bottom surface of the FR4 substrate. I hope it can give some clue about the model.

>The gain could depend on the rest of your geometry. Is this a monopole over a large (or perhaps even infinite) ground plane, or something else? If you post your model file, then others here can take a look at it and may be able to offer suggestions, explanations, etc. Thank you for your answer Robert, I couldn't post my whole model for now but I have attached the images of the general geometry and the electric field distributions on the bottom surface of the FR4 substrate. I hope it can give some clue about the model.


Robert Koslover Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 13.09.2020, 18:05 GMT-4
Updated: 4 years ago 13.09.2020, 18:12 GMT-4

Oh, nevermind... That doesn't look much like what I have in mind when I think of a "monopole over a ground plane." I tend to think of something more like this: https://www.electronics-notes.com/images/antenna-vertical-with-ground-plane-plate.svg . Your structure is quite complicated in comparison. And, if I understand your picture correctly, the ground plane doesn't even appear in the picture (right?!). The only ground I can see is just that ring at the feed and, maybe, part of the card's edge over there? And meanwhile, your antenna is dielectrically loaded by the FR4. Finally, since the actual (but not-shown) ground plane is likely to be very important to the performance (since this is a monopole, not a balanced dipole, and thus the image currents in the ground plane, wherever it is, play a key role in the antenna's operation), I'm just not sure what else to add, except to say that I can't guess what the gain, pattern, or S11 curve would be likely to show based on that geometry. (Now, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with your design, per se; I just don't have much intuition about it.) Best regards.

p.s. FYI, based on the apparent "ragged edges" in the transitions between colors in your plots, I suspect your mesh is too coarse.

-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Oh, nevermind... That doesn't look much like what I have in mind when I think of a "monopole over a ground plane." I tend to think of something more like this: https://www.electronics-notes.com/images/antenna-vertical-with-ground-plane-plate.svg . Your structure is quite complicated in comparison. And, if I understand your picture correctly, the ground plane doesn't even appear in the picture (right?!). The only ground I can see is just that ring at the feed and, maybe, part of the card's edge over there? And meanwhile, your antenna is dielectrically loaded by the FR4. Finally, since the actual (but not-shown) ground plane is likely to be *very important* to the performance (since this is a *monopole*, not a balanced *dipole*, and thus the image currents in the ground plane, wherever it is, play a key role in the antenna's operation), I'm just not sure what else to add, except to say that I can't guess what the gain, pattern, or S11 curve would be likely to show based on that geometry. (Now, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with your design, per se; I just don't have much intuition about it.) Best regards. p.s. FYI, based on the apparent "ragged edges" in the transitions between colors in your plots, I suspect your mesh is too coarse.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago 15.09.2020, 05:11 GMT-4

And, if I understand your picture correctly, the ground plane doesn't even appear in the picture (right?!).

p.s. FYI, based on the apparent "ragged edges" in the transitions between colors in your plots, I suspect your mesh is too coarse.

The ground of the model is on the bottom side of the substrate. I highlighted the ground area with yellow on the second image file which I have attached to this reply.

Yes, you are right, unfortunately, I use extremely coarse meshes to speed up the calculations. I need it especially when I sweep a certain frequency range such as range(500, 10, 2700) MHz. I don't know how the other softwares such as HFSS can do it very fast.

>And, if I understand your picture correctly, the ground plane doesn't even appear in the picture (right?!). > >p.s. FYI, based on the apparent "ragged edges" in the transitions between colors in your plots, I suspect your mesh is too coarse. The ground of the model is on the bottom side of the substrate. I highlighted the ground area with yellow on the second image file which I have attached to this reply. Yes, you are right, unfortunately, I use extremely coarse meshes to speed up the calculations. I need it especially when I sweep a certain frequency range such as range(500, 10, 2700) MHz. I don't know how the other softwares such as HFSS can do it very fast.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.