Discussion Forum

Hi

I'm not sure I understand you, acause for me your question seems too trivial, I may have missed something. But the variables u,v,w are the three components of the displacement, in COMSOL and the total displacement isonly the norm sqrt(u^2+v^2+w^2). Now youcan get u,v,w fore a point, but often its more precise to use the average over an area. In V4 now you have the min,max and average operators you can define over given areas.

Is this what you want ?

When you talk about the strain, you also have this variable defined, check your doc, or use the CNTRL space in a probbe or postprocessing data field

--
Good luck
Ivar

Hi Ivar, Thanks for your response. Yes the u, v, and w sounds like what I want. Where can you find these and how could I apply them for the 4 blue points in the picture I have attached? Also you mentioned the min, max, and average operators. Where can I find these to apply them in my model? Also would the first principle strain be the same as (delta L) /(initial L)? If not what should I be looking for in the postprocessing to get this type of output. I am unfamiliar with working with the heat transfer side of things since I mainly do research in the RF package so please forgive me.

Thanks again,
-Neal

Hi

really you should read through the structural (ST) and HT doc to get used to the variables, otherwise you will get probably easily wrong conclusions ;), know your tool, but for that start with very simple cases that you might analyse by simple analytical means to compare.

So u,v,w are the variables (default for displacements in COMSOL) and you need to define yourt points (set them in a selection Definition) (right click the "Definition" node and look carefully through all items, you will find the min, max, average, integration etc oprerator there too (there are mosty several layers of subnodes to pass, the "gems" are often hidden rather low in the three structure ;) then you apply the operator on these points. Once solved in the postprocessing you might call up the operator, or just look indicidually (unfortunately postprocessing does not accept an array :( would be nice ;) and you get the values in a table.

One thing, ormally point values are averges from the surrounding lines/surfaces and can be strongly influenced by their neighbours. Therefore I always check that I have a sifficient mesh density, and I average over an area covering enough elements (approaching St Venants principle) rather than picking points (or I define a metrology probe point in the middle of a surface, so it gets an extrapolated value but not directly the one of the adjacent physics border

--
Good luck
Ivar