Hello Drake Mith
Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.
If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
02.11.2010, 17:17 GMT-4
I'm having exactly the same problem... Did you ever resolve this issue?
I'm having exactly the same problem... Did you ever resolve this issue?
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
04.11.2010, 08:55 GMT-4
Hi
What puzzles me is that I see aluminium also for the inner part, I though it was hollow (= air ?)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
What puzzles me is that I see aluminium also for the inner part, I though it was hollow (= air ?)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
26.02.2011, 16:07 GMT-5
hello,
Have you ever figure this out. because i have this problem I have a structure in a fluid and i need to obtain the natural frequencies of the structure with the viscous effects from the fluid. Thank you
hello,
Have you ever figure this out. because i have this problem I have a structure in a fluid and i need to obtain the natural frequencies of the structure with the viscous effects from the fluid. Thank you
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
27.02.2011, 05:58 GMT-5
Are you using 4.1? Apparrently eigenvalue calculations for fluid-structure interation wasn't supported until 4.1. That's how I did it to work recently, though I am still getting the "Relative Error is greater than relative residual" bug. I have been using a freq-domain sweep though.
Ivar, I did forget to set the inner domain.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arts, crafts and sciences uplift the world of being and are conducive to its exaltation.
~Baha'u'llah
Are you using 4.1? Apparrently eigenvalue calculations for fluid-structure interation wasn't supported until 4.1. That's how I did it to work recently, though I am still getting the "Relative Error is greater than relative residual" bug. I have been using a freq-domain sweep though.
Ivar, I did forget to set the inner domain.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arts, crafts and sciences uplift the world of being and are conducive to its exaltation.
~Baha'u'llah
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
27.02.2011, 16:25 GMT-5
Hello,
Acoustic-Structure Interaction doesn't take into account the viscous damping effects on the structure from the fluid. I have simple problem that i made for a sanity check. Where you have fluid surrounding structure and when you get Eigenfrequency of the structure it should go up because of the stiffening effect of the fluid but instead its going down and you get different modes. Thank you
Vlad
Hello,
Acoustic-Structure Interaction doesn't take into account the viscous damping effects on the structure from the fluid. I have simple problem that i made for a sanity check. Where you have fluid surrounding structure and when you get Eigenfrequency of the structure it should go up because of the stiffening effect of the fluid but instead its going down and you get different modes. Thank you
Vlad
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
28.02.2011, 01:31 GMT-5
Hi
well I do not have the acoustic module (one of the three modules have not managed to get my boss to buy as I do not receive enough projects requests in these domains ;(
So, I would need to wait to I get a temporary demo license, that will perhaps arrive for one of the v4.2 workshops coming up soon, or at next Comsol Conference. But Vladimir, if this is so, send a request to "support" there should absolutely be some FSI set-up allowing such obvious (but not trivial) couplings in COMSOL at least to come
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
well I do not have the acoustic module (one of the three modules have not managed to get my boss to buy as I do not receive enough projects requests in these domains ;(
So, I would need to wait to I get a temporary demo license, that will perhaps arrive for one of the v4.2 workshops coming up soon, or at next Comsol Conference. But Vladimir, if this is so, send a request to "support" there should absolutely be some FSI set-up allowing such obvious (but not trivial) couplings in COMSOL at least to come
--
Good luck
Ivar
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
28.02.2011, 16:38 GMT-5
Hi
well I'm not COMSOL just to have that said, so I cannot comment for them.
But what you always can do i to add some damping on the boundaries via the equations:
if you look at the egenfrequency analysis equations of COMSOL you will see that external forces terms not related to iomega are dropped, so if you add a Cv*i*lambda term you will add some viscuous damping, up to you to scale Cv correctly.
The same way if you add a -k*i*lambda^2 term you will add a "k" spring (and change the eigenfrequency)
for a frequency swepp replace "lambda" by "2*pi*freq", and to avoid "orange unit errors", add two parameters
lambda = 0[1/s]
freq = 0[1/s]
But you can also add some ordinary BC damping (and look at the equations)
You are not linking the physics this way, but you do add one extra physics in, onto the other, via the equations like that, and you remain fully in Structural
I have attached a simple v4.1.0.154 2D model, play with the boundary loads (enable/disable for the different solvers)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
well I'm not COMSOL just to have that said, so I cannot comment for them.
But what you always can do i to add some damping on the boundaries via the equations:
if you look at the egenfrequency analysis equations of COMSOL you will see that external forces terms not related to iomega are dropped, so if you add a Cv*i*lambda term you will add some viscuous damping, up to you to scale Cv correctly.
The same way if you add a -k*i*lambda^2 term you will add a "k" spring (and change the eigenfrequency)
for a frequency swepp replace "lambda" by "2*pi*freq", and to avoid "orange unit errors", add two parameters
lambda = 0[1/s]
freq = 0[1/s]
But you can also add some ordinary BC damping (and look at the equations)
You are not linking the physics this way, but you do add one extra physics in, onto the other, via the equations like that, and you remain fully in Structural
I have attached a simple v4.1.0.154 2D model, play with the boundary loads (enable/disable for the different solvers)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
07.03.2011, 08:22 GMT-5
Hi all.
Check this paper from the Milan conference 2009 about eigenfrequency FSI. The idea is to linearize Navier Stokes.
www.comsol.com/papers/6747/
--
Niklas
Hi all.
Check this paper from the Milan conference 2009 about eigenfrequency FSI. The idea is to linearize Navier Stokes.
http://www.comsol.com/papers/6747/
--
Niklas