Andrew Prudil
Nuclear Materials
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
03.11.2014, 12:34 GMT-5
You only include the heat sources in the actual volume you are modeling. That means that if you exploit symmetry to model only half the object (the other half using using symmetry) you end up only including half the total power.
You only include the heat sources in the actual volume you are modeling. That means that if you exploit symmetry to model only half the object (the other half using using symmetry) you end up only including half the total power.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
03.11.2014, 13:26 GMT-5
Okay, so if I understand correctly. If i have a half model and I set the power in to be 250W, regardless of whether or not I put the symmetry heat transfer boundary condition, the mirrored 3D model only shows 250W and double the heat sources?
Further, I set a component in the solution as the heat source themselves, then i mirrored it and then I solved for total power in (W/m3) for the mirrored 3D data set and it gave me 500W for 100 sources. This is with the half model heat source B.C. as 250W. Am I missing something, as this contradicts what I am understanding from your explanation? (I am not saying you are wrong btw. I just dont understand).
Okay, so if I understand correctly. If i have a half model and I set the power in to be 250W, regardless of whether or not I put the symmetry heat transfer boundary condition, the mirrored 3D model only shows 250W and double the heat sources?
Further, I set a component in the solution as the heat source themselves, then i mirrored it and then I solved for total power in (W/m3) for the mirrored 3D data set and it gave me 500W for 100 sources. This is with the half model heat source B.C. as 250W. Am I missing something, as this contradicts what I am understanding from your explanation? (I am not saying you are wrong btw. I just dont understand).
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
03.11.2014, 18:32 GMT-5
Sorry, I can be dense. I understand your explanation now. Thank you very much.
Sorry, I can be dense. I understand your explanation now. Thank you very much.