Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
16.10.2014, 16:27 GMT-4
Hello Arjun,
If you can, use 4.4: we've introduced a Boolean Operation called "Partition" that lets you do what you want easily.
Best,
Jeff
Hello Arjun,
If you can, use 4.4: we've introduced a Boolean Operation called "Partition" that lets you do what you want easily.
Best,
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
16.10.2014, 17:17 GMT-4
Hi Jeff,
I appreciate your help. Unfortunately I only have access to 4.3b. Any tricks you recommend in this?
Regards,
Arjun
Hi Jeff,
I appreciate your help. Unfortunately I only have access to 4.3b. Any tricks you recommend in this?
Regards,
Arjun
Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
16.10.2014, 22:13 GMT-4
Have you tried combining your geometry with various rectangular blocks (to separate it into the parts you want) using Boolean operations such as difference and intersection?
Have you tried combining your geometry with various rectangular blocks (to separate it into the parts you want) using Boolean operations such as difference and intersection?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
27.10.2014, 12:43 GMT-4
The partition function worked wonders.
I've been going through some literature on the COMSOL website regarding mesh quality. The write up mentions, "minimum mesh quality" as a good parameter to assess mesh quality. It also mentions that these parameters vary with respect to the different applications.
I'm currently working on a 3-D model that simulates microfluidic flow. I'm using an insanely fine mesh yet the minimum mesh quality is of the order e-4. I've ensured the growth-rate is limited to 1 but have the x-direction geometry scale set to 3. (the direction in which steep gradients occur)
Any ideas on which parameters might be a tell-tale sign of a good mesh for a micro-fluidic application?
Cheers
The partition function worked wonders.
I've been going through some literature on the COMSOL website regarding mesh quality. The write up mentions, "minimum mesh quality" as a good parameter to assess mesh quality. It also mentions that these parameters vary with respect to the different applications.
I'm currently working on a 3-D model that simulates microfluidic flow. I'm using an insanely fine mesh yet the minimum mesh quality is of the order e-4. I've ensured the growth-rate is limited to 1 but have the x-direction geometry scale set to 3. (the direction in which steep gradients occur)
Any ideas on which parameters might be a tell-tale sign of a good mesh for a micro-fluidic application?
Cheers