Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtern

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Determining Capacitance between Multiple Conductors

Posted 13.09.2014, 18:18 GMT-4 Version 4.3a 4 Replies

Chris Reilly
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi,

I have a system with 3 conductors as in the attached image. The first (left) conductor is set to a terminal boundary with V = 1. The second (right) conductor is set to a terminal boundary with V = 0. The last one (the floating conductor) is set to floating potential with Q0 = 0.

However, I'm not able to measure the capacitance between terminal 1 or 2 and the floating conductor (the only options are C11, C12, C21, C22). What boundary condition should I be using on the floating conductor to allow me to measure the capacitance?

Thanks,
Chris

Attachments:

4 Replies Last Post 18.09.2014, 03:17 GMT-4
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 14.09.2014, 03:13 GMT-4
Hi Chris,

well for the purpose of measuring the capacitance make it a terminal as well, since capacitance only depends on the geometry (and the medium between the electrodes). For other purposes make it float again. The capacitance will remain the same.

Cheers
Edgar

--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Hi Chris, well for the purpose of measuring the capacitance make it a terminal as well, since capacitance only depends on the geometry (and the medium between the electrodes). For other purposes make it float again. The capacitance will remain the same. Cheers Edgar -- Edgar J. Kaiser emPhys Physical Technology http://www.emphys.com
Chris Reilly
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 14.09.2014, 13:19 GMT-4
Thanks Edgar, that approached worked.
Thanks Edgar, that approached worked.
Chris Reilly
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 16.09.2014, 19:17 GMT-4
Hey Edgar, another quick question. I'm trying to show that by increasing the permittivity and conductivity of the top conductor, the capacitance seen at the right (sense) conductor increases. However, when I set the three conductors to measure the capacitance, I get no change in capacitance when the relative permittivity or conductivity are altered. I also get the same effect when setting the left terminal to 1V, the right terminal to 0V and floating the top electrode.

Any ideas on how to demonstrate this? See the attached paper if you have any questions, I'm essentially trying to replicate their results in figure 4 and 5.

Thanks,
Chris
Hey Edgar, another quick question. I'm trying to show that by increasing the permittivity and conductivity of the top conductor, the capacitance seen at the right (sense) conductor increases. However, when I set the three conductors to measure the capacitance, I get no change in capacitance when the relative permittivity or conductivity are altered. I also get the same effect when setting the left terminal to 1V, the right terminal to 0V and floating the top electrode. Any ideas on how to demonstrate this? See the attached paper if you have any questions, I'm essentially trying to replicate their results in figure 4 and 5. Thanks, Chris
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 18.09.2014, 03:17 GMT-4
Hi Chris,

the "quick" question actually requires a lot of reading. I quickly browsed through the document and one thing I noticed is that they use AC excitation. Is your model taking this into account?

Cheers
Edgar

--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Hi Chris, the "quick" question actually requires a lot of reading. I quickly browsed through the document and one thing I noticed is that they use AC excitation. Is your model taking this into account? Cheers Edgar -- Edgar J. Kaiser emPhys Physical Technology http://www.emphys.com

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content