Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Smaller element size caused problem in Acoustic-Shell Interaction
Posted 13.03.2014, 23:34 GMT-4 Mesh Version 4.4 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I found an interesting result from COMSOL 4.4 Acoustic-Shell Interaction. Let me describe it here:
I have a 1 square meter cubic whose all 6 walls were set to Sound Hard Boundary except a A2 size window in the front wall where a 2.5 mm thick Aluminum Plate was mounted with 4 edges Fixed Constrained. Its a simple set-up. Then I just add the Acoustic-Shell Interaction physics and set the plate as the Exterior Shell. And I do a Eigenfrequency analysis.
Then comes the interesting thing. If I set the mesh size to "Normal", COMSOL will give out a reasonable result with the first coupling mode caused by the plate around 95Hz. But if I set the mesh size to "fine", there will be several local modes under 95Hz, which should not be real.
Why should this happen? How can I get a more accurate result for the acoustic-structure interaction analysis in COMSOL?
I have a 1 square meter cubic whose all 6 walls were set to Sound Hard Boundary except a A2 size window in the front wall where a 2.5 mm thick Aluminum Plate was mounted with 4 edges Fixed Constrained. Its a simple set-up. Then I just add the Acoustic-Shell Interaction physics and set the plate as the Exterior Shell. And I do a Eigenfrequency analysis.
Then comes the interesting thing. If I set the mesh size to "Normal", COMSOL will give out a reasonable result with the first coupling mode caused by the plate around 95Hz. But if I set the mesh size to "fine", there will be several local modes under 95Hz, which should not be real.
Why should this happen? How can I get a more accurate result for the acoustic-structure interaction analysis in COMSOL?
1 Reply Last Post 15.03.2014, 23:03 GMT-4
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
But if I do a Frequency Domain frequency sweep excitation, the result won't be sensitive to the element size any more... Who can give me some clue about how should this happen?