Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Theory of Brinkman equation

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I'm checking the theory of the Brinkman equation in the manual. There's a term I don't understand where stems from: 2/3nu(nabla u). I also checked the given references but this term is not metioned. Any clue?

1 Reply Last Post 11.09.2013, 10:53 GMT-4
COMSOL Moderator

Hello Silvia Bersan

Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.

If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.


Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 11.09.2013, 10:53 GMT-4

I'm checking the theory of the Brinkman equation in the manual. There's a term I don't understand where stems from: 2/3nu(nabla u). I also checked the given references but this term is not metioned. Any clue?


Hi,
It's a viscous term which comes with the gradient of u and the transpose gradient.
In the classic Navier Stokes equation this term disappears because the divergence of u is zero.

Is it clear now?
[QUOTE] I'm checking the theory of the Brinkman equation in the manual. There's a term I don't understand where stems from: 2/3nu(nabla u). I also checked the given references but this term is not metioned. Any clue? [/QUOTE] Hi, It's a viscous term which comes with the gradient of u and the transpose gradient. In the classic Navier Stokes equation this term disappears because the divergence of u is zero. Is it clear now?

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.