Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Multilayer structures: multiple Rectangles or one Rectangle with Layers?
Posted 26.03.2013, 09:08 GMT-4 Geometry, Structural Mechanics Version 4.3a 3 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Dear all,
I am dealing with multilayer structures, and I have a small doubt: modelling a multilayer, do I get the same results (and of course the same physical meaning) using:
1) different rectangles (i.e. in Geometry having Rectangle 1, Rectangle 2 etc.)
2) use only one "Rectangle" but defining the thickness of the layers in "Layers" (in the Rectangle window)
Or, to be more precise, is the procedure 2) more suitable when you have to model a multilayer with a large number of layers (so it's faster than to create multiple rectangles)? But, of course, you have the same model and results, is it correct?
Regarding this issue, why does in the model "layered plate" (in the Model Library) it is used the option 1) instead of 2) ?
Thank you very much
Fabio
I am dealing with multilayer structures, and I have a small doubt: modelling a multilayer, do I get the same results (and of course the same physical meaning) using:
1) different rectangles (i.e. in Geometry having Rectangle 1, Rectangle 2 etc.)
2) use only one "Rectangle" but defining the thickness of the layers in "Layers" (in the Rectangle window)
Or, to be more precise, is the procedure 2) more suitable when you have to model a multilayer with a large number of layers (so it's faster than to create multiple rectangles)? But, of course, you have the same model and results, is it correct?
Regarding this issue, why does in the model "layered plate" (in the Model Library) it is used the option 1) instead of 2) ?
Thank you very much
Fabio
3 Replies Last Post 27.03.2013, 12:58 GMT-4