Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
05.02.2013, 04:43 GMT-5
I added the electric currents (ec) physics to my problem. I do the piezoelectric study first and then the electric currents. I made the piezoelectric material a current source, but still no current is flowing...
What am I missing?
I added the electric currents (ec) physics to my problem. I do the piezoelectric study first and then the electric currents. I made the piezoelectric material a current source, but still no current is flowing...
What am I missing?
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
05.02.2013, 05:28 GMT-5
Hi
but normally PZT solves already for V arnt you doubling up your dependent variables ?
Normally you will only get current flow if you have a closed circuit with non zero conductivity, so I suspect that you have missed something in your model build-up
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
but normally PZT solves already for V arnt you doubling up your dependent variables ?
Normally you will only get current flow if you have a closed circuit with non zero conductivity, so I suspect that you have missed something in your model build-up
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
05.02.2013, 05:55 GMT-5
I use the solved V, from PZT, for the second study (ec).
The PZT model doesn't use the conductivity as part of the model?
I use the solved V, from PZT, for the second study (ec).
The PZT model doesn't use the conductivity as part of the model?
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
05.02.2013, 07:53 GMT-5
Hi
that's it, because PZD solves for _u_ and V, there is nothing more by adding in EC and solving again for V2. So normally you can get everything via PZD physics
If you have defined a GND and a Terminal You should get a Voltage out, for a given impedance you have the bulk current too, and the complex impedance, and voltage gives you indications on phase lag
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
that's it, because PZD solves for _u_ and V, there is nothing more by adding in EC and solving again for V2. So normally you can get everything via PZD physics
If you have defined a GND and a Terminal You should get a Voltage out, for a given impedance you have the bulk current too, and the complex impedance, and voltage gives you indications on phase lag
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
05.02.2013, 08:34 GMT-5
Thanks, think I am getting to where I want to be!
Thanks, think I am getting to where I want to be!
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
24.07.2013, 09:07 GMT-4
Hi Stanley,
How did you find the current / impedance?
Regards,
Naveet
Hi Stanley,
How did you find the current / impedance?
Regards,
Naveet
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
24.07.2013, 09:14 GMT-4
Hi Naveet,
The solution I came up with is using the AC/DC module, not sure if you have it?
I add the second physics (the AC/DC). In the piezoelectric physics I specify the top end of my piezoelectric device (where the maximum voltage is) as a Terminal.
In the AC/DC module I can then use that Terminal as a voltage source, close the loop with a resistor and a current is measured.
The problem with this solution is that the current is a constant. There is no variation with resistance within the device.
Please let me know if this helps and if you maybe find a better solution.
Hi Naveet,
The solution I came up with is using the AC/DC module, not sure if you have it?
I add the second physics (the AC/DC). In the piezoelectric physics I specify the top end of my piezoelectric device (where the maximum voltage is) as a Terminal.
In the AC/DC module I can then use that Terminal as a voltage source, close the loop with a resistor and a current is measured.
The problem with this solution is that the current is a constant. There is no variation with resistance within the device.
Please let me know if this helps and if you maybe find a better solution.