Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Piezoelectric device Physics
Posted 21.03.2012, 11:32 GMT-4 Version 4.1 2 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hello all,
I have been trying to calculate resonance frequencies of a PZT device and have been obtaining complex Eigen frequencies. I then modeled a single-crystal cantilever beam in the Piezoelectric device module and in the Solid mechanics module. In the piezoelectric module I get complex eigen frequencies but the real part of it matches with the estimates of solid mechanics module. Can anyone tell me as to why Piezoelectrc device module gives comlex frequencies. To me a silicon cantilever should not have a complex frequency! Can anyone explain?
Thanks,
Sankha
PS: In the piezoelectric device module I had turned of damping, dielectric losses, still got complex Eigen frequencies.
I have been trying to calculate resonance frequencies of a PZT device and have been obtaining complex Eigen frequencies. I then modeled a single-crystal cantilever beam in the Piezoelectric device module and in the Solid mechanics module. In the piezoelectric module I get complex eigen frequencies but the real part of it matches with the estimates of solid mechanics module. Can anyone tell me as to why Piezoelectrc device module gives comlex frequencies. To me a silicon cantilever should not have a complex frequency! Can anyone explain?
Thanks,
Sankha
PS: In the piezoelectric device module I had turned of damping, dielectric losses, still got complex Eigen frequencies.
2 Replies Last Post 29.03.2012, 22:23 GMT-4
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Hi
but whith wich phase angle ?, if you turn off all damping in PZT the imaginary part should be small, most probably in solid without damping the complex part is simply ignored, because it's easy to get complex eigenfrequencies in Solid with some damping
What's so wrong with imaginary eigenfrequencies ?, you can always take the norm and the phase value
--
Good luck
Ivar
but whith wich phase angle ?, if you turn off all damping in PZT the imaginary part should be small, most probably in solid without damping the complex part is simply ignored, because it's easy to get complex eigenfrequencies in Solid with some damping
What's so wrong with imaginary eigenfrequencies ?, you can always take the norm and the phase value
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Hello,
I have been thinking and reading about piezoelectric device mode, and seems that to accommodate for energy losses , piezoelectric constants are expressed in complex form. This is why whatever material I use (be it single-crystal silicon) there is always some numerical residue left which appears as the complex component.
I was looking at the manual at found that Eigen frequency is equal to (-) Im(Eigen value)/ 2*pi.
I observed that if I calculate the Eigen value and follow the aforesaid expression I get real numbers all the time. Can you comment on as to why this behavior is observed.
I do not have problem with complex resonance frequencies, as long as I know for sure why complex frequencies are obtained!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks
Sankha
I have been thinking and reading about piezoelectric device mode, and seems that to accommodate for energy losses , piezoelectric constants are expressed in complex form. This is why whatever material I use (be it single-crystal silicon) there is always some numerical residue left which appears as the complex component.
I was looking at the manual at found that Eigen frequency is equal to (-) Im(Eigen value)/ 2*pi.
I observed that if I calculate the Eigen value and follow the aforesaid expression I get real numbers all the time. Can you comment on as to why this behavior is observed.
I do not have problem with complex resonance frequencies, as long as I know for sure why complex frequencies are obtained!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks
Sankha