Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtern

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

problem in Mie Scattering of Plasmonic Nanoparticle simulation(model 3459)

Posted 08.03.2012, 05:47 GMT-5 5 Replies

Hao Li
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi everyone:

We met a problem in solving the extinction cross section of the single gold nanoparticle by using the model 3459.

We keep the size of the nanoparticle the same and change the diameter of the outter PML,
BUT, the calculated extinction spectra also change along with the PML.

That result is against the physics, and we will not be able to get the right spectrum.

So, any one could help, is there any trick need to notice or we did something wrong?

Thanks!

Attachments:

5 Replies Last Post 09.03.2012, 10:41 GMT-5
Pu
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 08.03.2012, 06:08 GMT-5
Can't access to the model u referred to.
Can't access to the model u referred to.
Alexander Kuznetsov
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 08.03.2012, 13:12 GMT-5
I can't find the model. I looked instead on the similar model, called "Optical Scattering Off of a Gold Nanosphere". I changed the thickness of air around the particle moving PML away and the model seems stable for this change.
I can't find the model. I looked instead on the similar model, called "Optical Scattering Off of a Gold Nanosphere". I changed the thickness of air around the particle moving PML away and the model seems stable for this change.
Pu
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 09.03.2012, 03:52 GMT-5
Do you mean the extinction calculated from far field is changing when PML is changed?
Do you mean the extinction calculated from far field is changing when PML is changed?
Hao Li
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 09.03.2012, 10:38 GMT-5
Thank you! I'll try this new model
Thank you! I'll try this new model
Hao Li
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 09.03.2012, 10:41 GMT-5

Do you mean the extinction calculated from far field is changing when PML is changed?


not only from the far field, near field results also change with PML
[QUOTE] Do you mean the extinction calculated from far field is changing when PML is changed? [/QUOTE] not only from the far field, near field results also change with PML

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content