Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
PML or PEC?
Posted 23.01.2012, 06:43 GMT-5 RF & Microwave Engineering, Geometry, Parameters, Variables, & Functions Version 4.2 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi
I'am doing a simulation with RF module. It's about the mode analysis of a rib silicon waveguide.
When defining the boundary of the model which method is preferred to use, PML (Perfect Matched Layer) or PEC (Perfect Electric Conductor)?
I would like to try to avoid any result being affected by reflection from the boundary. Can you use both or is one of the preferred?
Thanks!
I'am doing a simulation with RF module. It's about the mode analysis of a rib silicon waveguide.
When defining the boundary of the model which method is preferred to use, PML (Perfect Matched Layer) or PEC (Perfect Electric Conductor)?
I would like to try to avoid any result being affected by reflection from the boundary. Can you use both or is one of the preferred?
Thanks!
1 Reply Last Post 23.01.2012, 07:09 GMT-5
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Hi,
if you want to avoid reflections then the choice should be easy: The PML (ideally) doesn't reflect anything, the PEC reflects everything. Typically you would use a PEC to simplify the modeling of highly conductive metals such as silver, copper or aluminium if frequencies are not too high.
Cheers
Edgar
if you want to avoid reflections then the choice should be easy: The PML (ideally) doesn't reflect anything, the PEC reflects everything. Typically you would use a PEC to simplify the modeling of highly conductive metals such as silver, copper or aluminium if frequencies are not too high.
Cheers
Edgar