Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
EM Waves -> Frequency domain -> Scattered field: Direction of energy flow
Posted 06.08.2016, 12:02 GMT-4 1 Reply
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I am looking at energy flow calculated using the scattered field formulation, but the direction i get is opposite of what i expected. As a simple example, lets consider a plane wave with the electric field polarized along the y-axis propagating in the +z direction, e.g. [1]
E_b = [0, E0*exp(i*kz*z), 0]
where kz = 2*pi/lmb (in air) and E0 is the field amplitude. Now, since the wave in propagating in the +z direction, i would expect the energy flow also be in the +z direction. However, the calculated energy flow in COMSOL is in the -z direction, see attached MWE.
Can anybody enlighten me what i have done/understood incorrectly?
[1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plane_wave#Complex_exponential_form
E_b = [0, E0*exp(i*kz*z), 0]
where kz = 2*pi/lmb (in air) and E0 is the field amplitude. Now, since the wave in propagating in the +z direction, i would expect the energy flow also be in the +z direction. However, the calculated energy flow in COMSOL is in the -z direction, see attached MWE.
Can anybody enlighten me what i have done/understood incorrectly?
[1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plane_wave#Complex_exponential_form
Attachments:
1 Reply Last Post 08.08.2016, 09:07 GMT-4
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
After some more research i found out that the definition of a forward propagating wave differs between different fields of science. Indeed the usual definition for a physicist (like me) is
E_b = [0, E0*exp(i*kz*z), 0],
but engineers and mathematician tend to use a slightly different convention
E_b = [0, E0*exp(-i*kz*z), 0].
Apparently COMSOL adapts this convention and hence the energy flow is opposite of what a physicist would expect.
E_b = [0, E0*exp(i*kz*z), 0],
but engineers and mathematician tend to use a slightly different convention
E_b = [0, E0*exp(-i*kz*z), 0].
Apparently COMSOL adapts this convention and hence the energy flow is opposite of what a physicist would expect.